In short: In the 2010s and 2020s, 97% of parliamentary proposals are accepted. Pure popular initiatives pass 31% of the time. In between stands the counter-proposal – successful 70% of the time.
What happens when the city of Zurich votes on its own affairs? Not on federal ballots, not on cantonal laws – but on its own budgets, regulations, and initiatives.
Since the 1970s, the relationship between these three channels has shifted.1
Parliamentary proposals are rejected less and less often: from 80% acceptance in the 1970s to 97% in the 2010s and 2020s. The few rejections concern large-scale projects (stadium, convention centre) or politically charged topics (all-day schools, council compensation).1
Pure popular initiatives fail more often than not. In the 2000s, not a single one was accepted (0 of 7). Since then, the rate has recovered – to 45% in the 2020s.
In between lies the counter-proposal. Parliament takes up an initiative, drafts its own version – and this version passes about 70% of the time. The instrument is relatively new at this intensity: in the 1990s, there were none. Since the 2010s, there are 13 per decade. Topics: housing, cycling, green spaces, wages. The counter-proposal is the tool through which parliament absorbs popular initiatives and translates them into its own language.
Open Data City of Zurich – Vote Results since 1933. Own analysis: 375 municipal proposals of the city of Zurich since 1990 (city-wide results). Classification: “Volksinitiative” or “Initiative” in title = popular initiative, “Gegenvorschlag” in title = counter-proposal, “Stichfrage” = counted separately (3 cases), remainder = parliamentary proposal. ↩︎ ↩︎